Reading Time: 3 minutes

Popular movie actor Keanu Reeves is no philosopher king, but he thinks like one.

When he was once asked by TV talk-show host Stephen Colbert what he thought happened when people died, Reeves, in Marcus Aurelius fashion, responded rationally and philosophically (see YouTube clip, here):

“I know the ones who love us will miss us.”

He didn’t talk of the dearly departed looking down on us from some ethereal place on high.

It was the kind of practical expression of material reason, as opposed to supernatural speculations, that are credited to actual philosopher kings such as the Stoic Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius (reigned 161–180 A.D.). Aurelius, as did others of that school of thought, believed that kings should be philosophers and that only philosophers should rule.

This quote below attributed to Marcus Aurelius reflects this noble ethos:

“Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones.”

The passage is epicurean in that it focuses on happiness, existential balance and living a “good life” as essential. It’s stoic in that it values reality over speculation. And it’s agnostic in that it advises that whether or not gods exist shouldn’t affect how one lives life.

Of course, these concepts — epicureanism, stoicism and agnosticism — are extensive and very complicated (and some might say they’re often unfathomable), but they are essential elements of nontheist conceptualizations. The first acknowledges that happiness reflects successful living. The second, that because life is inevitably difficult and painful, it is best born with rational forbearance, not emotional abandon. And third, we don’t know everything, but what we do know very strongly indicates the material cosmos is all that exists.

The idea of “philosopher kings” comes to us from ancient Greek philosopher Plato’s Republic, a purported diolague with Socrates on the ideal of a just society in which specialized military “guards” who were “virtuous and selfless” — men and, controversial in patriarchal Athens, also women — would rule with noble intent.

Plato was an idealist, envisioning that a rigorous selection process would always ensure the enthronement of a “virtual and selfless” elite. We’re still struggling to achieve that ideal. Two words: Donald Trump.

But, Plato was undeterred. In Republic, he wrote, as Socrates:

“Until philosophers rule as kings or those who are now called kings and leading men genuinely and adequately philosophize, that is, until political power and philosophy entirely coincide … cities will have no rest from evils … there can be no happiness, either public or private, in any other city.”

The notion, according to the Encylopaedia Britannica, “is that the philosopher is the only person who can be trusted to rule well. Philosophers are both morally and intellectually suited to rule: morally because it is in their nature to love truth and learning so much that they are free from the greed and lust that tempts others to abuse power and intellectually because they alone can gain full knowledge of reality.”

Marcus Aurelius was a fascinating popularizer of stoic philosophy, having acquired its knowledge from a learned Greek slave, Epictetus, which is why this Roman emperor wrote his Meditations in Greek. The treatise has been viewed over many generations as “one of the great books of all times,” the encyclopedia notes.

But, ironically, the emperor didn’t see himself as great, writing Meditations, which lays out the basic moral tenets of stoicism, “to nerve himself for his daunting responsibilities.”

Although Marcus Aurelius has been iconic over many centuries in the West as the exemplar of the “Golden Age” of the Roman Empire, the seeds of its ultimate implosion were germinating during his reign.

Despite the obvious nobility of character in this “philosopher king,” to which historians readily attest, he was neither a visionary nor necessarily consistent with his stoic beliefs.

Instead of choosing a “virtuous and selfless” successor before he died, he instead made the unphilosophical, emotional choice of anointing his only surviving but relatively ignoble son, Commodus.

But it was still a rational, if fraught, choice. Under the rules of succession at the time, if Commodus had not been named successor, his father would have had to execute him.

Come to think of it, Keanu Reeves probably wouldn’t be a half-bad president. Unfortunately, he’s Canadian.

Quote, thanks to Bold Atheism/Image of Marcos Aurelius

Please sign up (top right) to receive new Godzooks posts via email, Facebook or Twitter

“Erudite yet readable … very illuminating”

— Richard Dawkins, author of “The God Delusion,” in praise of “Holy Smoke”

Buy either book on Amazon, here (paperback or ebook editions)

Avatar photo

Rick Snedeker

Rick Snedeker is a retired American journalist/editor who now writes in various media and pens nonfiction books. He has received nine past top South Dakota state awards for newspaper column, editorial,...